Free Speech or Censorship?

 

The big issue recently has been whether the Jimmy Kimmel show was cancelled due to politics or censorship. So, let's set the record straight once and for all. He wasn’t taken off the air due to censorship, government overreach or any other bogus reason; it was due to economics, morality, and responsibility as a public figure. Let’s break it down for those in the back row.

Will Rogers was a comedian back in the day. Rogers would use politics as his main concept to jab against elected officials, but he was never disrespectful in any way with his jabs. Red Skelton, another comedian who also made fun of elected officials, but never in a disrespectful way. You see, these two men were actual comedians, not egotists looking for laughs; they naturally received laughs because they had and shared humor with their audience. Unfortunately, Kimmel isn’t funny at all, and his material is not only crass, but also downright rude, immoral, and irresponsible in nature. Not sure who writes his material, but he should fire them and hire real comedy writers.

You see, celebrities think that they can say anything they want at any time and get away with it because they are a celebrity, but in fact, that’s not the case. There are things called moral responsibilities that celebrities should adhere to. Like my father used to say, “never utter words in public you don’t want to read on the front page of the New York Times tomorrow morning, if you don’t want to be a laughingstock of society.”

Many are claiming that someone's removal violates the 1st Amendment, but it's really about economics and branding.  Mocking tragedy or behaving irresponsibly online leads to consequences—like losing a job.  

Companies don’t want you representing their brand if you act like an idiot in public or on the internet. Then you get back on social media and cry a river because you lost your job. Geez, people get a life and stop acting like a spoiled toddler. Hell, toddlers act better than you do. All the morons getting on social media and creating content that celebrates a murder, or blasts a person for what they say or do in their life, but who uses disrespectful wording, sayings, and screams censorship, and how could you get me fired? Sorry, folks, you got fired by acting like a child on social media. Employers don’t want people working for them to act like petulant children without any moral responsibilities.

What I find interesting is that the people screaming and complaining about a breach of 1^st Amendment rights apparently have never read the 1^st Amendment clause in the Bill of Rights, nor do they understand the historical significance of the amendment. So let me give you all a history lesson and Historical Context:

In 1791, the First Amendment was added to the Bill of Rights to protect individual freedoms from “government intrusion.” 

The Founding Fathers, having faced British oppression, aimed to cultivate an environment where free expression thrived—ensuring that varied perspectives could be voiced without fear of censorship or retribution by the “government”.

Freedom of Speech: The framers intended for the First Amendment to guarantee the right to free speech, allowing individuals to express their opinions and ideas “without government restraint.” This was seen as essential for a healthy democracy, where robust public “discourse could lead to better governance”.

The original intent serves as a compass, but its meaning has transformed with court interpretations.

The Supreme Court carefully weighs individual freedoms against societal needs, expanding our view of protected speech and religious expression.

In essence, the First Amendment was crafted to secure fundamental rights and uphold democracy—an enduring pillar of American freedom today! The Framers didn’t anticipate the invention of the Internet, where citizens would create stupid videos, which gave them a platform to spew nasty, ugly comments, or cry about injustices that are made up and shared while acting like children. Each video does not convey accurate information, viable facts, or authentic perspectives regarding issues presented by the government to society.  It is being produced and allowed by idiots to express their stupidity live and post it up for the world to see that same stupidity and egotistical purposes forever.

Therefore, the First Amendment only guarantees you the right to express ideas and information. It does not give you the guaranteed right to slander, insult, mock, or degrade someone you don’t like or respect. Those types of comments and statements are both dangerous and disrespectful. Like my father used to say, “think, decide, and act.” “Think about your intended actions or speech, decide if you are going to hurt someone or yourself and be very careful about your intent before you open your mouth or create a situation that could harm you or the reality you represent (your boss or the company that pays your bills), then act on your motive and speak, but remember to accept the responsibility and consequences that come from your statement and actions.”

Talk show hosts like Jimmy Kimmel or Stephen Colbert forget that the airwaves their show is broadcast on are shown on Public Airwaves that are designed for public interest. Therefore, ABC, NBC, and CBS must broadcast shows that are in the public interest and showcase shows that have entertainment value. Jimmy Kimmel didn’t think before he spoke on his show, which caused him to be cancelled. Stephen Colbert also didn’t think before he spoke and suffered the consequences.  Neither of them is any different than the idiots that went on TikTok, X, and other social media outlets spouting off their hate and evilness, nor think about the potential consequences of their actions; they just wanted the clicks and attention.

Johnny Carson, former host of The Tonight Show back in the day, described to Mike Wallace how his show used to work and how modern-day comedians use late-night shows to their own advantage. “Comedians never used the Tonight show for serious issues; that's not what I'm looking for as a host. Today’s hosts can't say that because they think that just because you have a Tonight Show that you must deal with serious issues. That's a danger, it's a real danger once you start that, you start to forget you’re a host or comedian and begin to feel that you’re so important, and that what you say has great importance, and you know you can use that forum to sway people, and I don't think you should do that as an Entertainer.” He was correct, you’re an entertainer, not a politician or an elected official or of any real importance, you’re just an entertainer, so entertain your audience and shut up already about your political beliefs or ideology. 

Elizabeth Kilbride is a Writer and Editor with forty years of experience in writing, with 12 of those years in the online content sphere. Author of 5 books and a Graduate with an Associate of Arts degree in Business Management, a bachelor’s in mass communication and cyber-analysis, a master’s in criminology with emphasis on Cybercrime and Identity Theft, and is currently studying for her Ph.D. degree in Criminology. Her work portfolio includes coverage of politics, current affairs, elections, history, and true crime. Elizabeth is also a gourmet cook, life coach, and avid artist in her spare time, proficient in watercolor, acrylic, oil, pen and ink, gouache, and pastels. As a political operative who has worked on over 300 campaigns during her career, Elizabeth has turned many life events into books and movie scripts while using history to weave interesting storylines. She also runs 7 blogs ranging from art to life coaching, food, writing, Gardening, and opinion or history pieces each week.

American Rescue Plan Act of 2021

The American Rescue Plan Act is nothing more than a rewritten New Deal Act enacted by FDR during the depression. Although modern-day Democrats never admitted that they thrust us into a mini depression, they submitted legislation based on the same premise as the New Deal Act. They claimed it was to be a $1.9 trillion economic stimulus package aimed at helping those forced to stay home from work due to their COVID-19 pandemic. Their American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 was nothing more than double-speak based on the original New Deal Act of the 1930s.

FDR’s New Deal Act was based on two levels, first introduced during Roosevelt's first hundred days in office in 1933 and continued until 1935, wherein he introduced the "First New Deal", which focused on the "3 R's": 

1) Relief for the unemployed and for the poor, called the Investment and Jobs Act, 17 pages of nonsense under HR3684. All this is double-speak language in 277 pages in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which was an amendment to the 1986 Tax Code. 

2) Recovery: The goal of recovery was to stimulate the economy and promote job creation. These initiatives were designed to revive industries and reduce unemployment. The National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) was one such program that aimed to boost industrial growth and improve labor conditions. Roosevelt believed that government intervention was essential to jump-start the economy and foster growth.

3) Reform: The reform aspect sought to implement long-term changes to prevent future economic crises. This included establishing regulations to stabilize the financial system and protect citizens. Key legislation included the Securities Exchange Act, which regulated the stock market, and the Social Security Act, which provided a safety net for the elderly and unemployed. 

The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 sounds just like the 1933 plan:

Direct Economic “Relief”: The Act provides direct payments of up to $1,400 for individuals and $2,800 for married couples, plus $1,400 for each dependent. This aimed to support families facing financial hardships due to the pandemic.  I never got this payment, did you? 

Recovery under the new act would

Support State and Local Governments by allocating funds to stimulate and replenish depleted revenue not collected due to citizens being forced to stay home and not shop or pay sales taxes in local communities. This amount was approximately $350 billion.

The second phase of Recovery was to supplement the Unemployment Benefits: By extending unemployment benefits, the government believed this would help people who lost jobs during the pandemic.

More Recovery went to Funding Schools:

While schools weren’t able to house and allow students to attend classes, the bill provided over $130 billion for K-12 schools to help them safely reopen and address learning loss, ensuring that students could return to in-person instruction safely.

Now we have the most heinous Recovery:

COVID-19 Vaccine Distribution: The Act allocated $14 billion for the distribution of COVID-19 vaccines, aiming to force citizens to take the vaccination to return to work or school. If they refused, they couldn’t return to work, which would force them into poverty and homelessness. 

Reform: Allocated Support for Small Businesses: The legislation included $50 billion for small businesses and $25 billion specifically for relief for small and mid-sized restaurants, helping them recover from the economic downturn. Unfortunately, the paperwork required to be filled out prevented many small businesses and restaurants from obtaining any assistance under this aspect of the bill. So, who really received this portion of the funding allocated in the bill?

Conclusion

The American Rescue Plan Act represents one of the most fraudulent responses to the economic challenges caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. On the surface, it aimed to provide comprehensive support to individuals, families, businesses, and local governments as the nation navigated recovery. Unfortunately, it failed at providing any true support to the American People, except for the few they wanted to line the pockets of, many a Politician around the country and in Washington, DC.

There was also a provision in the bill for climate change language, which included EPA provisions to reduce electricity for low-income housing across the country. This I found interesting because it sounds just like the program an elected official in Georgia created in order to receive a $2 billion grant from the Inflation Reduction Act to make nationwide energy-efficient home improvements that never happened. So what happened to that funding. 

Elizabeth Kilbride is a Writer and Editor with forty years of experience in writing, with 12 of those years in the online content sphere. Author of 5 books and a Graduate with an Associate of Arts degree in Business Management, a degree in Mass Communication and Cyber Analysis, and a master’s in criminology with emphasis on Cybercrime and Identity Theft, and is currently studying for her Ph.D. degree in Criminology. Her work portfolio includes coverage of politics, current affairs, elections, history, and true crime. Elizabeth is also a gourmet cook, life coach, and avid artist in her spare time, proficient in watercolor, acrylic, oil, pen and ink, gouache, and pastels. As a political operative who has worked on over 300 campaigns during her career, Elizabeth has turned many life events into books and movie scripts while using history to weave interesting storylines. She also runs 7 blogs ranging from art to life coaching, food, writing, Gardening, and opinion or history pieces each week.

Poor Infrastructure Part 2

 

When I began my research into the infrastructure issues in this country, I started with how states divided up the funding they receive through taxes from lottery winnings. I was surprised to discover that every state claims it puts that money into education, but in fact, it allocates it to general funding. General funding is supposed to take care of infrastructure and maintain social service programs. In reality, that money doesn’t get spent on what is needed; instead, it goes into elected officials’ pork projects that might help get them reelected. This, my fellow citizens, is robbery and should be dealt with on a state level before the next election. Accordingly, I believe that a strong commitment to public infrastructure has rarely been achieved in America, both sought after and hard to realize.

As I delved deeper into the government programs, I remembered the programs FDR created under his New Deal Series of economic, social, and political reforms that he introduced in 1935. Three programs dubbed the “3 R’s” covered Relief for the Unemployed, Recovery of the economy to bring it back to normal levels, and prevent the Repeat of the disaster of the depression. His New Deal also created several other programs the AAA (Agricultural Adjustment Administration) that paid farmers to grow certain foods on their farms and the CCC (Civilian Conservation Corps) which hired able bodied men foer manual labor on government owned land, creation of the electrical grid and economic development programs such as the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and the drainage of the Tennesee River Basin.

Although the first phase of the New Deal focused on economic recovery, it also addressed key issues, such as the Banking Act of 1933 and the creation of the Federal Emergency Relief Administration (FERA). FERA aimed to reduce unemployment by generating unskilled jobs in local and state governments. While these positions were costlier than cash assistance, they offered a vital boost to the self-esteem of those unemployed. From May 1933 to December 1935, FERA allocated $3.1 billion (equivalent to $70.8 billion today), supporting over 20 million people and enhancing public facilities nationwide. In 1938, FERA was renamed the Works Progress Administration and was responsible for the construction of bridges, libraries, parks, and other facilities. It also branched out into creating the Fair Labor Standards Act, whereby prohibited child labor and created the 40-hour work week that we know today. Unfortunately, the only thing the New Deal Act produced was the labor coalitions and unions we know today. By World War II, everyone thought the Tammany Hall gang members were taken down, but during the war, they were regrouping and redesigning their efforts into something new. We now know them as labor Unions, such as the AFL-CIO, Teamsters, and other union organizations that control workers. Not only do they control workers, but they also use them for bargaining power to gain more power over the industries they supposedly support. They use that power to force politicians to do their bidding in exchange for their support during an election. They buy and sell those same workers' rights at every given turn, not caring for their jobs, their families, and their financial futures. After all, those same employee’s have already paid their dues to stay in the union that doesn’t give a damn about them in the first place.

Now let’s talk about the lack of roads, bridges, and airports not being maintained. In 1956, President Eisenhower was convinced that there should be a Federal-Aid Highway Act, which would pave the way for modern transport networks that transformed national connectivity and commerce.

Our roads across America are a disgrace, filled with potholes and broken asphalt or cement, causing vehicle damage. This causes roads to be unstable during bad storms. Case in point, roads being washed away during heavy rainstorms as in Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and Tennessee this past year.  

Now let’s look at the Bridges that require repairs, yet instead fall apart during high commuter travel time. Bridges are falling down, causing death and destruction due to failed maintenance. Where is the money allocated for road and bridge maintenance, dogged by state legislator leaders? Whose pockets are being lined up by such payments?

With the introduction of the internet, we find so many companies latching onto their ability to use the internet for commerce and communications. Unfortunately, not all Americans can afford the high prices of the internet. This is where the SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, comes into play. The SEC is supposed to ensure that companies cannot become a monopoly, which could cause financial collapse in the economy. Unfortunately, while companies aren’t collapsing, individuals are financially collapsing under the burden of costs associated with simple living. Millions lack affordable broadband or the basic ability to communicate with the outside world. 

The American public has suffered from persistent infrastructure problems, largely due to a lack of political will. It’s time for leaders to step up and take action! Investing in our infrastructure is crucial for building a better future together. Plus, it has to do with securing our National Security. 

During President Joe Biden's time in office with the help of the 117th Congress together they redesigned the New Deal act and came up with  three new names resembling the same programs as I mentioned above, but this time they called it “The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law,” “The American Rescue Plan,” and “The Inflation Reduction Act”.  Collectively, these initiatives would invest more than $1.2 trillion into vital improvements in transportation, clean water, and climate resilience. Unfortunately, those allocated dollars went into the pockets of Congressional friends and donors who were listed as contractors for the same programs in their home districts. We’ve not seen any improvements in the states where the money was sent. Talk about bogus programs and theft.

What was supposed to help empower communities nationwide, urban and rural alike, to pursue their aspirations and address pressing challenges effectively isn't happening at all. Instead, it's hindering every state across the country due to elected officials who are more interested in lining their pockets than in helping their fellow Americans survive and thrive.

The federal government must better address the challenges faced by small cities as well as large cities. Instead of appointing political appointees to high positions, they need to appoint people who know how to build bridges, roads, and critical infrastructure such as power, communication lines, and water lines within a grid. This approach should be standard for all agencies working with local areas.

Federal investments ought to cover a range of pivotal areas, including:

- Technical assistance 

- Support for local innovation 

- Data management capabilities  

- Strong project management 

These elements are essential for fostering effective and sustainable growth.

 Elizabeth Kilbride is a Writer and Editor with forty years of experience in writing, with 12 of those years in the online content sphere. Author of 5 books and a Graduate with an Associate of Arts degree in Business Management, then a degree. Mass Communication and Cyber Analysis from Ashford University, then on to Walden University for her master’s in criminology with emphasis on Cybercrime and Identity Theft and is currently studying for her Ph.D. degree in Criminology. Her work portfolio includes coverage of politics, current affairs, elections, history, and true crime. Elizabeth is also a gourmet cook, life coach, and avid artist in her spare time, proficient in watercolor, acrylic, oil, pen and ink, gouache, and pastels. As a political operative who has worked on over 300 campaigns during her career, Elizabeth has turned many life events into books and movie scripts while using history to weave interesting storylines. She also runs 7 blogs ranging from art to life coaching, food, writing, Gardening, and opinion or history pieces each week.

 

Poor Infrastructure Maintenance

 

Poor Infrastructure Maintenance

Neglecting infrastructure costs the U.S. billions every year! Yet our state legislatures tax us through sales, real estate, vehicle registration, and property taxes, claiming it’s to improve maintenance infrastructure for better living. Yeah Right. Whose pocket is this money going into these days?

Last month, I researched where lottery taxes go in each state, and I was shocked to find that it went into a general fund in most states for this very issue, even though they say it is for education costs, when the schools never see that money. Instead, it goes into general funds, which means the elected officials in each state can use it for whatever they want to use it for, redecorate their offices? They don’t use it for road repairs, bridge repairs, wildlife preservation or even waterway clean-up projects, which most states claim to use it for, but don’t.

Many states charge tolls for using roads and bridges, but never put that money in an account so that their department of transportation can allocate it for said road or bridge repairs. So, where does that money go? 

Massachusetts, New York, and New Jersey use taxpayers' funds to fix roads and mini-bridges. How do we know that is happening, because The Big Dig in Boston has been going on for about 30 years now, with no end in sight. New York has supposedly been fixing roads and bridges for the last 25 years, just look at the traffic backups on the Belt Parkway, the LIE, and the George Washington Bridge over the last 25 years, and they charge a toll for all three with high-priced ticket prices. Same goes for New Jersey, just take a ride on their city/county roads and you’ll find a pothole every few feet.

When bridges collapse during inclement weather, that should tell you something is very wrong within your state. Like what happened in Pennsylvania during a snowstorm that injured a number if people. 

Look at the rest of the country, and your eyes will pop out of your head at deferred maintenance impacts, financial burdens on taxpayers, and so-called smart strategies for proactive care that never happen.

My friends in Washington, DC, claim that investing in infrastructure enhances accessibility, fights poverty, ensures safe drinking water, and safeguards vital assets. While I can agree with that statement, I don’t see it happening throughout the United States. How do I know this? Because I’ve traveled across this great nation for many years, driving across it multiple times and the one consistent problem I’ve seen is poor infrastructure maintenance.

If each state actually were conducting proactive infrastructure maintenance with taxpayer dollars, they could actually reduce long-term repair costs while improving public safety both on the roads and bridges within their state. They might actually prevent sickness by cleaning their water systems and maintaining them properly.

When Politicians don’t understand that neglecting infrastructure maintenance it leads to hidden costs and economic burdens for communities.

Today, we have advanced technologies that can help enhance maintenance efficiency by providing real-time data and predictive analytics that could help save money in the long run, but elected officials claim their experts disagree with such technology. Wonder why? Maybe because those experts are being paid off to keep their jobs.

I’ve heard that the Department of Transportation at the federal level wants to work with each state by conducting collaborative approaches to infrastructure maintenance that foster economic growth and stakeholder engagement, but many states don’t want to work with the DOT because of politics.

With the number of unemployed in this country, why aren’t we creating a workforce development program like FDR created and called the Works Progress Administration (WPA)? The WPA was a vital New Deal agency from 1935 to 1943, providing jobs for millions during the Great Depression. Under Harry Hopkins' leadership, it funded public projects like roads and schools, creating over 620,000 miles of streets and thousands of bridges. This program could be  crucial and beneficial to addressing the skills gap in infrastructure maintenance.

Unfortunately, the majority of our elected officials on the federal, state, county and local agencies don’t have any understanding of the significance of what Infrastructure Maintenance is all about and don’t want to learn about it either.

So let me educate them here. Infrastructure maintenance is crucial for society, covering everything from dams to railways, waterways to roads and bridges. Smart upkeep not only boosts resilience but also tackles common challenges like aging systems and resource constraints. Education and predictive tools are essential in overcoming these hurdles, emphasizing the need for proactive maintenance strategies!

State and Federal Infrastructures are the backbone of our modern world, delivering vital services and fueling economic growth.  For example, the National Park Service counts on top-notch infrastructure to safeguard nature's wonders, while economists spotlight its role in boosting productivity.  Smart infrastructure management—like predictive maintenance—ensures sustainability and reduces risks like floods. The interwoven systems underscore just how essential they are! Case in point the flooding in North Carolina that took out complete towns, roads, and communities could have been prevented if proper infrastructure maintenance had been maintained over the years.

When we think of our road system, remember that transportation networks help to facilitate commerce and mobility for our economy and daily transportation.

The same goes for our power grids that power our homes and businesses. If these grids are not maintained, we could be compromised financially and jeopardize national security.

Let’s not forget that the following areas are vitally important to our sustainability.

          Our water systems are designed to ensure public health and safety

      Communication networks that enable global connectivity and communication with family and friends

      Public parks and spaces that foster community engagement.

In conclusion, we need to hold our elected officials' feet to the fire about using our tax dollars the right way to ensure we are protected from harm by first fixing our roads and bridges, then tackling the other issue mentioned in this article.  Next week I will continue about this issue and go into different details.

Elizabeth Kilbride is a Writer and Editor with forty years of experience in writing, with 12 of those years in the online content sphere. Author of 5 books and a Graduate with an Associate of Arts degree in Business Management, then a degree. Mass Communication and Cyber Analysis from Ashford University, then on to Walden University for her master’s in criminology with emphasis on Cybercrime and Identity Theft and is currently studying for her Ph.D. degree in Criminology. Her work portfolio includes coverage of politics, current affairs, elections, history, and true crime. Elizabeth is also a gourmet cook, life coach, and avid artist in her spare time, proficient in watercolor, acrylic, oil, pen and ink, gouache, and pastels. As a political operative who has worked on over 300 campaigns during her career, Elizabeth has turned many life events into books and movie scripts while using history to weave interesting storylines. She also runs 7 blogs ranging from art to life coaching, food, writing, Gardening, and opinion or history pieces each week. 

Opinion, Kilbride, Infrastructure,

 

Red Carpet Beauty or Clown show?

The Cannes Film Festival committee made a bold move this year by setting strict rules on what attendees could and shouldn’t wear on the red carpet. In previous years the Hollywood elite have worn next to nothing on the red carpet, whether it be for photo click bait, or they just didn’t care how they looked, They just wanted attention or maybe wanted to seem like hookers, prostitutes or street walkers and the men where no better in how they dressed. But this year the Cannes Committee put their foot down and declared there would be no scantily clad clothing or better yet, hooker style clothing on the red carpet and they were prepared to remove anyone who dared to show up looking like street whores or pimps. Way to go Cannes Film Festival Committee, I applaud you for taking a stand. 

According to my sources from that committee, they want the festival to return to the glamour of old Hollywood style red carpet clothing that displayed elegance and sophistication. Remember when actors wished to influence society with glamour and fame rather than seeking to look like hookers, pimps and no talent individuals searching for fame through ugly photo’s printed in rag magazines? 

Maybe if Hollywood would return to the years when studios guarded the images of actors and studios to ensure morals and behavior were worth something in the eyes of society. Instead Hollywood can’t be bothered to ensure that starts uphold some form of standard of decorum and moral behaviors, instead we’ve got sluts like Miley Cyrus showing up on the red carpet dressed in a see-through gown that leaves nothing to the imagination or making ugly remarks that she forgot to wear underwear. Hey Miley, it’s not flattering or even cute, it’s downright ugly, so why don’t you grow up already!

The Met Gala is no different. One would think that a fashion-oriented event would be filled with beautiful outstanding gowns and real men’s attire, instead we see ugly dresses, boobs and butts hanging out or you can see right through the fabric, leaving nothing to the imagination and men dressed like idiots in unmanly clothing. The Met Gala has turned into a clown show of ugly clothing. No wonder no one wants to invest in fashion anymore, their taste is far more sophisticated than the clown outfits being strutted around at the Met Gala. One would think that an event backed by Vogue would have better taste than what is being shown on that red carpet. Do these people even look in a mirror before they leave the house? Why doesn't anyone tell them they look stupid and not flattering at all. They look like clowns going to a circus. 

Elizabeth Kilbride is a Writer and Editor with forty years of experience in writing, with 12 of those years in the online content sphere. Author of 5 books and a Graduate with an Associate of Arts degree in Business Management, then a degree. Mass Communication and Cyber Analysis from Ashford University, then on to Walden University for her master’s in criminology with emphasis on Cybercrime and Identity Theft and is currently studying for her Ph.D. degree in Criminology. Her work portfolio includes coverage of politics, current affairs, elections, history, and true crime. Elizabeth is also a gourmet cook, life coach, and avid artist in her spare time, proficient in watercolor, acrylic, oil, pen and ink, gouache, and pastels. As a political operative who has worked on over 300 campaigns during her career, Elizabeth has turned many life events into books and movie scripts while using history to weave interesting storylines. She also runs 7 blogs ranging from art to life coaching, food, writing, Gardening, and opinion or history pieces each week. 

Opinion, Elizabeth Kilbride, Fashion, Hollywood Glamour, Met Gala, Cannes Film Festival